Your reality is expendable

If you have reached this web page and, more specifically landed on this blog post it is very probable that you have been looking for answers for a long time. Nonetheless, nothing seems to satisfy your quest.

Probably you suspect that there is something about the current concept of reality that somehow every one of us have been missing, specially in moments of global transition.

First of all, please check out how familiar -and happy- you are with the fact that we inhabit (or relate ourselves within) what is called “consensus reality“.

Once coming into terms with the fact that our experience of what each one of us call our reality is always subjective, the time has come to let it go!!

Please get ready to drop whatever is left of the attachment to your own reality after you watch this video:

Interesting uh? If reality is not a tangible thing, this means that in a way reality does not really exist (pun intended). Adopting this change of paradigm is the closest any one can get to “take the red pill” from Matrix the movie.

Current philosophical conversations have not yet reached as far as the Global Convergent Logic has in this direction: nowadays we constitute a quiet movement, a descentralized network of peers (normal people) who are able to inhabit and navigate the metacognitive realm that lays outside or beyond or abroad  the fictional existence that we mistakenly call reality.

This realm is not tangible, it is the conceptual framework from where all realities are being co-generated by us.

If this makes sense to you and you would like to explore and integrate this new perspective we invite you to contact a facilitator.

Advertisements

You can’t change the world…

You might have already reached this conclusion as well, you already are aware that it does not work this way. But you might sense the subtle notion that you can’t change yourself either, this is why mainstream coaching is outdated and you landed here, looking for answers.

Let us make ourselves four simple questions in order to check our current status about change.

  1. I want the world to change (or people and things around me), because I want troubles to stop bothering me, I need to be left alone.
  2. I want to change the world, because I need to impose my own view about how people should behave and the right way for things to be.
  3. I want to change the world, because I inherited the believe that it is my responsibility to change things in order to make other people happy.
  4. I want to change the world, and I am willing to dedicate all the time and intention to join other people so that we manage to improve things not before we have taken every one’s view into account.

Albert Einstein once said: “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them

We can boldly take this quote one step further and claim that for a problem to be solved it is necessary to get rid of the observer of the problem in the first place, if we replace the latter with a wiser observer it’s likely that the problem will disappear instead of needing to get solved in the old-fashion way.

So, how do we change to a wiser observer? the quick answer would be “by changing ourselves”.Yes, that has been tried as well and obviously it’s not working, otherwise you would’t be here reading this post.

Bthechange

The proposal from the Global Convergent Logic is to admit that we do not control things as much as we like to believe.

A computer program is not able to delete or over-write itself, in the same manner we can not get rid of our identity as current self-help methods propose. Computers use boot loaders to get updated, we have the same system installed by default in our biology and it works mostly at night totally out of our egoic control.

In order to be-come- the change that we want to see in the world, as recommended by Gandhi we just need to identify our distortions of preception (what we call errors), identify the logic behind them, and without judgement we are invited to hand over whatever remains outside our understanding to another stage of consciousness that makes sense of it all through a nightly derivation. The “door program” or “fifth observer” gets swiftly activated in our mind and in due course -if we were really neutral about the outcome- we will get results in our everyday life.

We won’t get good -or bad- results, because once reached this point we will have fully understood that nothing is wrong with the world and we do not need to change anything, mostly because we can’t control things during wakefulness…. and this my darling is what they call to become really awake.

If you want to pursue this avenue, we will be more than happy to help!

Nightly derivation, how it works

The following is a translation from a post in Alejandra Casado’s official forum where she describes the nightly derivation. The text has been re-adapted in order to render it more accessible for an English speaking audience.

derivaciónI’m assuming that all the things that happen and bother me are actually bringing a message that I can’t -yet- understand.

Thus I decide to establish a link with the coherent emitter (another dimension of the self) and say: OK, I am open to see what I can’t see, to understand what I don’t understand, to perceive what I don’t seem to perceive; we enable our mind as a receiver. We advise to practice this at night because during the day our slow daytime consciousness is in charge, at night our fast unconsciousness is managing us.

At night there is a shift from our “slow observers” to our “fast observers”[*], the instant you are falling asleep you renounce your current understanding: I open myself to grasp that which I do not get and thus we are giving permission to our receiver to be nurtured in a non-existence, and synchronize with the horrific message in a totally different way, and this will modify my perception when I get back to wakefulness.

If I do not get used to practice this that is called anticipation while I am connected with my linear life, along with my linear design, the unconscious will storm my life with a tragic death, with a terrible illness, with things like that. Because I am busy in insisting that life is what my mother, father, ancestors, teachers, politicians, religious authorities, etc. taught me within a outdated design. I have to go beyond my design and get into the “negative” of my design (as in fotography), which exists prior to my design and my identity.

Things get resolved in this realm of non-existence[**], because there is no conflict there. We humans are actually expected to close down the cycle of conflicts. It is about time that we as humanity say “enough is enough!” I have had enough of life being about the unfolding of conflict in my family, in this nation, all over the world.

Now we want to know what is the result of the torsion of all conflicts, both global and personal. I seek to know because I don’t know, it exceeds my design, nobody taught me, it doesn’t come from the past, in the past something like this ever happened; in the past problems were solved in a heartbeat and today we have nuclear, bacteriological arsenals and other weapons… Obviously we can’t continue with the logic of slapping each other today. We need to use other tools to solve conflicts before they even get to our tangible existence.

In other words, it’s about letting go of the idea that I have an answer within my reach, I don’t have control over anything, I don’t know and thus I practice a derivation.

This derivation practice has many other forms and ways, for example the Sedona Method is also about letting conflicts flow with detachment.

If you would like to explore the GCL way to deal with conflicts you can contact us.

[*]:GCL acknowledges that humans are interdimensional beings, that there is more of us functioning while we sleep (and periodically during wakefulness), preparing our mind and body to respond in an optimized way to the next instant.

[**]: realm of non-existence in this case means the realm previous to existence.